I was reading another mommy blog,
Suburbian Turmoil and she wrote a post about
private school kindergarten. Some parents are holding their children back so they are older in kindergarten (6 or 7 years old) with the intent that their child will be bigger, smarter, stronger when they get to junior high and high school. This is called redshirting. As a recap of
her blog, parents are sending their child to public school kindergarten at age 5-6 and then sending them to private school kindergarten the next year in the hopes that their child will have a "leg up". At some schools the age gap is 2 years (5-7 year olds) in kindergarten with almost 50% of the kids in the older age group. This sets up the possibility that your 13 year old daughter is in 8th grade with boys that can drive. Or some kids being 20 years old when they graduate from high school. I had never heard of this phenomenon, has anyone else? I wonder what the world is coming to, when parents think it is a good idea to hold their child back in kindergarten just so there is the possibility that their kid is bigger and stronger for high school sports and possibly smarter academically. With more than 50% of children in a class being older, it perpetuates the problem as parents of younger kids consider holding back also just so their kid isn't the youngest in the class. Kids have hard enough time in school making friends and learning the ways of human socialization to throw in the 2 year age gaps could compound all sorts of awkward situations you encounter in school. What do you think, are you as appalled by this practice as I am? Have you ever heard of redshirting? Whatever happened to the way things were when we were kids?
2 comments:
Michelle was one of the oldest in her class and was 19 when she graduated. She had a classmate with the same birthday who was 2 years younger. You could always tell the difference in maturity. I only kept her out of school because I wasn't ready to part with her... Didn't know it had a term associated with it! She has always done well in school but I don't think it has anything to do with her age.
I know there is some holding back due to age cut off dates and we had kids in our class that were maybe 6 months or so older than the majority of the class but to have 50% of a class be 1-2 years older is a litte excessive I think. And I agree, I don't think holding a child back is going to make them any smarter unless your holding back for true developmental reasons. Not just so they will be the biggest kid on the football team.
Post a Comment